Sitting Duck Policy

Do you know who's policies are making you a Sitting Duck?
Home » Archive by category 'Prohibited Places'

LA Gun Control Applies to Toy Guns, wait, what?!

June 15th, 2011 Posted in humor, Prohibited Places

California is the birthplace of scores of foolish gun control schemes which have done nothing to reduce crime, but have gun owners I that state stripped of their rights. The latest attempt to blame guns (of any type!) instead of criminals was just released.

Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck is proposing that the city require BB-gun replicas of actual firearms to be brightly colored so that police officers don’t mistake them for real weapons.

Theoretically, the cops will then refrain from shooting kids who foolishly point toy guns at cops. However, it also is a trap for cops who will likely face a bad guy who painted their “real” gun a bright color to fool the cops.

With the huge arsenals I the hands of illegal immigrants, drug dealers and gang members in California, they really should be able to come up with a better crime fighting tool than this!

Full story at http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lapd-fake-guns-20110607,0,7534310.story

2011 Utah Legislative Update

The 2011 Utah Legislative Session ends Thursday at 11:59pm.  There are still two high priority pro-gun bills which may be considered along with several less important ones.

Seven pro-gun bills have passed already. Sadly, one was defeated.

HB 129 by Rep. Carl Wimmer is the “Constitutional Carry” bill that would eliminate the need for law abiding citizens to have a permission slip to carry self defense weapons.  This was amended to add an undesirable requirement to notify police if you are carrying, even if you just see your neighbor who is a cop at the donut shop.  Perversely, the law protects CRIMNALS from having to tell police if they are armed, but the good guys would and that makes no sense at all.  Worse, if a citizen failed to immediately notify the cops they could be charged and prosecuted.  USSC worked to get this fixed, but it may be too late to get it fixed and passed.  If unsuccessful, we will start over again next year.  We expected that this might take several tries.

HB 424 by Rep. Paul Ray clarifies that the mere sight of a gun is not grounds for arresting or charging anyone with disorderly conduct.  That is the strategy some government entities have adopted in their latest round of harassment of law abiding gun owners.  That needs to be fixed, so that people who are actually threatening others can be prosecuted, but not an innocent open carrier or even someone carrying concealed whose jacket flips open and briefly exposes a gun.  This bill (which we refer to as “disorderly conduct”) has not had any action and it is unlikely to be passed in the remaining hours of the session, but some really strange things have happened in the waning hours in the past, so we are not giving up.

Bills that have Passed

HB 75S1- The “School zone” gun ban is redefined to match the federal criteria also used by our neighboring states, not an invisible and unenforceable 1,000 foot radius from school grounds, or around day cares and trade schools.  The enhanced penalties remain for gun crimes within a 1,000 foot radius, but mere possession will not be a crime any more.  Common sense reform long overdue.

SB36S1- “Home state concealed carry permits first-”   Applicants in states that recognize Utah permits will have to get a permit from their state before applying for a Utah permit.  This should help halt any further loss of recognition of Utah permits.

HB 219- Designates the John M. Browning designed Model 1911 pistol as the official Utah State Firearm.

HB 214 adjusted concealed carry permit fees down $5 for initial applications and up $5 on renewals to better match the actual cost to process them.

The other bills are minor technical issues not needing further discussion in this alert. Full details on the USSC website http://UtahShootingSports.com.

Walmart fires employees for self-defense

February 16th, 2011 Posted in Activism, Prohibited Places Tags: , , ,

Walmart fires employees for self-defenseSeveral Walmart employees witnessed a customer shoplifting and escorted him to a holding room in the back of the store. During his detention the customer decided it was time for him to leave. When the Walmart employees denied his request he reportedly brandished a firearm, threating the employees.

According to comments by the employees, there’s only one way out of the room, and they didn’t have anywhere to go without risking personal injury. Faced with only one other option, the employees decided to subdue and disarm the customer.

Sounds like a great case of heroism to me, wouldn’t you agree?

Apparently, Walmart has a corporate policy that prohibits their employees to defend themselves —  more specifically, they must flee (even if they are unable to do so) rather than confront a customer.

Walmart has now fired four employees tied to this incident.

Via KSL.com

Why were they fired? Violation of Walmart policy AP09.

If… the suspect has a weapon or brandishes or threatens use of a weapon; all associates must disengage from the situation, withdraw to a safe position, and contact law enforcement.

Walmart spokesman Dan Fogleman reponded with the following:

“We appreciate the intentions demonstrated by our associates in this situation, but the actions taken put their safety – and potentially the safety of our customers and other associates – in jeopardy. In their roles within the store, they were aware of our expectations regarding safety and, unfortunately, their actions have led to them no longer working for the company.” (source)

Walmart’s actions have led me to no longer do business with them.

I don’t spend my money in places that prevent the general public from being able to defend themselves while on their property, I think I’ll include Walmart in this as well.

Now you have a choice:

  • Stop shopping at Walmart
  • Support a company that fires its employees for defending themselves

If you choose to stop shopping at Walmart, please print the following, and deliver it to the manager of your nearest Walmart store.

Over the years I have spent thousands of dollars at Walmart stores. After the manner in which Walmart handled a situation in their Layton, Utah store, that’s about to change.

This particular issue arises from various Walmart policies which essentially force employees to become victims at the hands of would-be criminals. In Layton, four employees disarmed a wanted felon — in defense of their own lives — because they couldn’t “disengage” without someone being killed or seriously wounded. Walmart’s response? Rather than issue a commendation of heroism — they were fired.

A Walmart spokesperson responded with the statement that “their actions have led to them no longer working for the company”.

To that I reply, Walmart’s actions have led me to no longer spend my money in your stores.

If you wish to regain me as a customer, the following must be met:

  1. Walmart must enact a new policy that provides self-defense overrides any other policy, stating that if an employee acted in self-defense with reasonable force, no disciplinary action shall be taken for such actions.
  2. Walmart must recognize, via a formal commendation, the actions taken by the four former-employees from the Layton, Utah store.
  3. Walmart must make resonable accommodation to the same, including, but not limited to reimbursement for lost wages caused by the folly of this policy.
  4. Notice of the above must be provided to me in writing at the address noted below.

More information can be found at http://bit.ly/fired-for-self-defense

Tell the manager, put simply, neither you, your family, nor your friends patronize companies that fire their employees for defending themselves.

Let me know what response you get in the comments below.