Sitting Duck Policy

Do you know who's policies are making you a Sitting Duck?
Home » Posts tagged 'firearm'

SCOTUS: 2nd Amendment Guarantees Individual Right

June 28th, 2010 Posted in Activism Tags: , , , , ,

The Supreme Court of the United States today handed down their landmark decision in the McDonald case. In short, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is, in fact, an individual Right, not one restricted to the Militia, nor one that only applies to the Federal Government.

This means that States, Counties, and Cities cannot have laws that prohibit the keeping or bearing of arms.

LEO Encounter: traffic stop

October 21st, 2009 Posted in preparedness Tags: , ,

Question

If I’m carrying a firearm in my vehicle and am pulled over for a routine traffic stop, should I inform the officer about the presence of a firearm?

Answer

First, we don’t offer legal advice on this site. You’ll want to contact your attorney or Department of Public Safety (or both) to make sure you’re abiding by the laws in your locality.

Second, we at Sitting Duck Policy have the utmost respect for those involved in law enforcement. 

When you are pulled over you are, by definition, being detained. You are not free to leave until the officer permits you to leave. The officer will ask you questions and is authorized to keep you detained until they have completed their investigation.

If the law requires you to notify the officer, abide by the law. Otherwise there are two schools of thought on what to do next.

  • One says don’t tell the officer anything more than what you’re legally required to, and exercise your right to remain silent.
  • The other says to be open and cooperative.

It’s up to you to decide how to proceed.

If you are in a locality that requires a permit to carry a firearm, when the officer asks you for your license and registration also pass him/her your carry permit. Don’t volunteer any information that you’re not specifically asked.

If they then ask you if you are carrying a firearm you can reply that you have a permit and are legally allowed to do so. It’s not answering their question per se, but it is notifying them that you are legally allowed to do so.

If they ask again, you can either respond by asking "am I legally required to answer that?" or answer specifically in a manner such as "my sidearm is on my right hip".

Remember, if you answer, you are required to answer truthfully; ironically, LEOs are under no such requirement to be truthful to you.

Furthermore, anything you say WILL be used against you. You are protected against self-incrimination in that you are not required to testify against yourself; however, you may ignorantly voluntarily testify against yourself. That is not illegal.

Know the law. Know your rights. Don’t let anyone, even a LEO, tread on those rights.

Nevada’s CFP Reciprocity with Utah and Florida Ends

In a political move, Authorities in Nevada have decided that the Concealed Firearm Permits (CFP) issued by Utah and Florida “materially differ” from those issued by Nevada, and are thereby exempt from reciprocity.

In other words, as of July 1st, 2009 Nevada will no longer honor Utah and Florida CFPs.

The reasoning? Nevada permits are valid for a period of 5 years and require live-shooting proficiency as part of the requirements to be eligible for a Nevada CFP.

Utah does not require a live-shooting as a requirement for obtaining the permit, Nevada does.

Florida permits are good for 7 years, 2 more than Nevada’s 5.

Nevada, we feel, is picking at straws and shouldn’t worry about these two seemingly minor issues. Utah and Florida could offer “extensions” to their permit (similar to drivers license endorsements for commercial vehicles or motorcycles) that indicate the CFP holder has been “certified” in live ammunition or has “renewed” their permit at the 5 year mark. We’re afraid of what kind of can-of-worms this might open.

In the meantime, we at Sitting Duck Policy are advising our readers to unload and properly store their firearms before crossing the line into Nevada – or avoid Nevada altogether until they reverse their policy.

Defensive Training Courses (Wendover, Utah)

May 12th, 2009 Posted in preparedness, training Tags: , , , ,

image Strategic Tactical Group is offering 3 two-day courses to be held in Wendover, Utah on June 27th & 28th, 2009.

Building Clearing (for the Home Owner)

The first course is offered is a two day building clearing course. Cost for this class is $100/person with a $75 nonrefundable deposit. This course is designed for the individual homeowner wants to have the tactics and mindset be able to clear his/her home encase of an intruder. Day one consists of tactics taught in the “soft house” and the date you is split up into two portions. The first half of day one is live fire, where you will be shooting live rounds inside of the building and engaging multiple targets. The second portion of day two will consist of force-on-force training utilizing Simunitions (simulated ammunition fired from real firearms).

Tactical Carbine (AR-15)

The tactical carbine course is taught based on the AR-15 weapon system. On day one topics covered will be nomenclature/statistics of the AR 15 malfunction clearing, equipment/optics, reloading drills and more. On day two it will involve how to clear building utilizing the AR-15. The building clearing portion will be done with no ammunition. Each student will be required to bring 300-400 rounds of ammunition, handgun with 150 rounds and appropriate safety gear. Cost for this course is $100 with a nonrefundable deposit of $75.

Precision Rifle

Precision Rifle is taught by military and a state certified sniper/designated marksman. In this course you will learn to shoot out to 1000 yards. Equipment for this course consists of rifle and preferably a minimum caliber of .243. Cost for this course is $320 with a $200 nonrefundable deposit.

Contact Information

Space is limited and filling up fast. Please call at 801-915-4118 or email at training@strategictacticalgroup.com for more info.

Chris Willden, Director of Training. Strategic Tactical Group LLC, www.strategictacticalgroup.com. Chris Willden is NRA Certified, a Utah CFP Instructor, an ASP Baton and O.C. Instructor, and a Glock and Bushmaster AR-15 Armorer.

Disclaimers

SittingDuckPolicy.com respects Chris Willden as a competent and qualified firearms instructor, and we recommend the services of him and the company for which he is employed.

That said, neither Chris Willden nor Strategic Tactical Group, LLC are affiliated with SittingDuckPolicy.com; this article is informational only and is not a “paid” or “sponsored” article.

Utah H.B. 357 Substitute Firearms Amendments (Sandstrom, S.) Signed into Law

Utah’s H.B. 357 Substitute  Firearms Amendments (Sandstrom, S.) was signed by the Governor on 03/30/2009.

This bill modifies provisions of the Utah Criminal Code related to firearms. It

  • modifies the criminal penalties exception provisions related to carrying a concealed firearm to apply to a vehicle in a person’s lawful possession and to a vehicle in the lawful possession of another, with the consent of that person;
  • allows a person to carry a loaded firearm in a vehicle in the person’s lawful possession or in a vehicle with the consent of the person lawfully in possession of the vehicle;
  • allows for the possession of a loaded firearm on a person’s real property; and
  • makes certain technical changes.

In plain English, this bill says that after the effective date you can carry a loaded or unloaded firearm in a vehicle that you are driving, or in a vehicle with the consent of the person driving it, or on your “real property” (which is legal speak for your “land”).

You’ve always been able to do this in your home (or temporary residence, or camp), but now you can in your home, in your yard, at your office (if you own it), in your parking lot at work (if you own it), and in your vehicle.

Of course, I am not a lawyer, so before you trust my interpretation of the law, contact Representative Stephen Sandstrom or your gun-law attorney.